2010-08-31

The new Digg - It's light and shadow

I like the new Digg.
Looks nice, and I'm using it for the first time in more than a year. I think it's great.
But it has some bugs. I produces plenty of errors. Sometimes I need to retry for 7 times to get it work. The search function seems to be the worst problem.
From time to time I see this nice, but annoying, picture:


All right...
I hope it will get better soon. But for me, it could stay this way with function design and the features. It's way better than the old digg, which never appealed to me.

MPEG LA tries free as in beer against WebM / Mozilla shrugs off h.264 license

I found an interesting article on ZDNet
 
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/mpeg-la-tries-free-as-in-beer-against-webm/7238

WebM was created as a project that could be specified within HTML5, being complete and free as in freedom. Will free as in beer trump it?

And in addition to that, The Register wrote that Mozilla shrugs off the "free beer" h.264 license. Of course. Free beer is not the point. Freedom of web-video is the important things. Thanks Mozilla/Firefox once again to take a stance for free software. And damn, free software means free as in freedom. Don't fall for suspicious men giving you candy to come home with them. Say no!

2010-08-28

Tell Me What To Do, Too Many Social-Networks And My Blogs

Yeah, I'm still asking myself what to do about the many social-networks. And my blog. I'm recurrently thinking about to blog everything(!) and then let it slip into the social-networks.
I'm thinking about it for more than a year. Now today I listened to Leo Laporte on TWiG #57, learning that he also thinks to do that this way. Well unfortunately  unlike Leo, I'm not popular :). So what does this mean?

Having everything on my blogs, and posting a link to a chain of services. It goes like blog -> buzz -> twitter -> identi.ca. And have mercy when there is another one chiming in.

While there is no problem with Google Buzz, the links that get posted to Twitter points to my Buzz post. Can't do it otherwise, because with services like Ping.FM or HelloTxt, my posting on Buzz looks terrible. No pictures, not enough text, only small excerpts ad so on. Basically it would be okay having the Twitter-People visiting my Buzz post to comment. But then I could have posted it on Buzz in the first line.
Then there is my status update postings like: "Hey I'm gonna slap myself in the face, I missed "Fraggle Rock" on TV today" :) Should I really put this in my blog?
You see the dilemma. To make it perfect, I don't want to leave identi.ca behind, but apparently this works better twitter<->identi.ca than any other way.

Then Tumblr came on my mind, too for doing those short notices. But this would be one more in line. And it also has some limitations.
With Buzz I can make a post with an Android widget, photo with a click, adding my GPS-position easily and off we go. I tried to do this on Tumblr and failed. I chose to do it via email, which is the fastest way for me on-the-go. But if I attach a photo, the body of the message including the Google-Maps-Link (which I have to use a special add-on for, too) is not present. Not in Tumblr and not in Buzz.
And even more annoying: Answering replies on Twitter. It would be not only annoying, but breaking the reply-chain. Same with identi.ca. So I have to spread my thoughts still all over the net. No "Central" at all.

And if you think that's all... wait a second. There are my pictures. Yes, the photos I'm going to send. I want them on Picasa, not only Tumbler, Ping.FM or wherever I posted from. Another major problem. I need to keep an eye on double or triple postings, or even an echo.
It isn't possible to do this without having a double post from time to time.
Oh and didn't I mention the legality problem? Yeah in some countries a blog is treated differently than a social network. With all consequences. And the accepted  fact that citing whole articles including pictures or videos is no problem on Buzz or other services like it. But how dar eou citing a complete articles with pictures on your blog. Woooh. Why? I don't know.

I really don't know what to do now.
We are far far away from having the single one place where we can do things and reaching all of our followers and friends over the internet.

If you have an idea or solution to this, please, please let me know. I'm really getting tired of this.

2010-08-27

We Need A Hippie-Movement In The Information Age / Hippie2.0

You know there are some times, where I ask myself what some people are thinking, or if they think at all, but sometimes, it's just that thinking that leads to something you don't really want.


Let me stride out a bit.
In the late 60th and early 70th, there was a hippie movement, beginning in the US, spreading all over the planet. Despite the bad effects, it has some major influence on the thinking, not only of a single generation, but on the thinking of many people. It lead to being more open to different races, gave women more power and strengthen their position in society. It allowed things to do, the people have been ashamed of even thinking before. More freedom on sexuality, just being what you will be, feeling like flowing in the cosmos freely.
Many things were illegal, but that didn't count. There were more important things than some books with letters said. And many people, for things at that time has been arrested, which were quite normal and legal after the ideas and things had been part of the day by day life. Not everything, though, but most of it.
To make it short: It pushed the understanding of freedom forward to a new level. Love it or hate it, they did it.

But as time goes by, it's like always, we forget. And now slowly, but continuously, we lose more and more of that expensive freedom. We already can not have a real and open free discussion about sexuality on TV. We damn nude stuff, and hide it from our kids as if nudity would be evil and unnatural. I never saw a baby come to life with clothes already on the body, but anyway. We are going to be the Squares another generation warned about.

And it's getting worse. As me move deeper into the information age, governments all around the globe, yes the western too, trying to control information and trying to control how and when information is available to someone. They have big, powerful backup from the so called "Content-Industry". Well, you can think what you want about that, but this can't work in a free and open society in the information age. This would only work in a totalitarian system, where everything is controlled and you would have no freedom at all, or just the freedom to work until you're old and die. We are on the edge of where this is gone to be decided.

What we need now is a new hippie-movement. The Information-Hippies! A free minded movement not only for data, for bits and bytes, but for the reality, too. There are some good beginnings like the Free Software movements e.g. But it can't reach people minds without bringing the new message of openness and freedom to real life. It might be irrelevant for our progeny, but then it would be already too late. Information is not only news or knowledge stuff, although it's the most important part, but it's every bit of data. We are more and more consumers. So if all the content is locked away for money, how is it freedom? Freedom should not need money, or money is the only freedom.

Photo by Ed Tech Diva. CC BY-NC-SA 2.0
We need a movement that don't obey to rules made by companies. We need to see that our own government might not be as free as you want them to be. We need to extend the rules once again for the information age, for the new age of real freedom. Talk about sex in public, talk about sharing software, talk about sharing information, even better share those information, don't let yourself get frightened by those you do not want to give you that freedom, use the information freely and open to anyone. Let the cosmic power once again shine on the old ways of thinking and break it. We are important, we have power, we have knowledge, we have information, we have our freedom. Let us use it to preserve it for the future, where all men and women have equal free access to every bit of public data.

Let us live this, not only on our computer monitors, on our gadgets or on Twitter. Let our mind go wild again in the real world, let us use our freedom to express anything we want peacefully, without restriction. Forget the boundaries once again, and forget the shame, there can be no shame, other than hiding the bits of the future of our children and commercializing the essential of human beings: Creativity.

Updated Version 1.1: I removed 2 small parts to clarify the statement.
1) In the 4th paragraph I removed ", the worst bloodsuckers until slavery was banned. They take the work of authors and selling it to others, telling people they 'protect' the authors."
This could make people think this was a hatred against the music or film-industry. It's not. The article means much bigger things including these, but not limited to. And there is no hatred at all.

2) in the 6th paragraph removed "Where everyone can use every piece of music and video for their own, non-commercial articles, that are also free."
Again, this is not about a specific part of the internet, Blogs e.g. It's the whole. That includes the Internet as well but not limited to.

I'll make this up in a wiki, soon. This needs some additions, too.

Freedom Of Web-Video Is Even More In Danger Now

Photo by XKCD. CC BY-NC 2.5
You might heard about that h.264 is now free (as beer) forever as long as you don't make money with it.
Well this is most intriguing. What's "freely distributed"? What about ads on your site or in the video? If you earn any money from ads or somewhere else because of this video, is it still legal without licensing fees?
FUD!

Now a concerning amount of users calling WebM dead, because now we can use h.264 for free. But that's totally wrong and very dangerous.
Free is not only "it costs nothing", free means you have rights over your stuff and you can do with it whatever you want. Calling the limitations of "freely distributed videos" free is wrong.

  1. There are still patents on h.264.
  2. There is still a questionable consortium behind it.
  3. There are still no free licenses.
  4. There are still 94% of users that can use WebM in future vs. 70% that can use h.264 (and if you count can't legally, it's even higher, see 6)
  5. Still Firefox can't and won't implement it, because of 1 and 3.
  6. Still, there is a gray zone about if you may even use it legally on free OS systems
So, for all your web-devs now thinking you can say bye bye to WebM: Don't! Or many users can't or won't watch your videos and you lose money and the reputation of people that cares about the freedom of the web. There is NO REASON why you should prefer h.264 over WebM.

For all the patent-free video evangelists, don't let your senses drown now, it's more dangerous than before. We lose freedom, even if it comes with no price tag.

Please, get your self a little bit good Karma and use WebM. Thanks!

Update:
Create Digital Motion has a good article: Apple-Centric Observers Get the Facts Wrong: H.264 Still Ain’t Free

Update 2:
Mozilla still standing. WebM is the only way. Read the article from The Register.

2010-08-21

Gamecom 2010 - Total Recall !

First get a glimpse of what we're talking about with this little and horrible quality video I made:


More photos
...

Now after 2009 I had high expectations for this year's biggest gaming expo on the planet. And again, I wasn't sorry that I went there on Thursday. It was huge, it was loud, it was fun and I'll probably never will get into the Blizzard booth. I was there only minutes after the expo opened, and the line already ends where a sign said "Don't get in line. Waiting time: 4 hours from this point." No way. Just like last year. They really need to do something about that. I don't even want to think about how this will be on Saturday, the strongest day. Can you even get into the hall?

Fun everywhere, cute booth girls, and in-game like models, the presentation was good at most places. Some of them were so loud you couldn't be there without ear protection. And some of them made strip shows to get the attention. There is luckily no restriction on the booth girls, so some bikini beauties were spotted, and some stripped for Poisonville. Man, I came too late, it just finished. Noooo.

But the most important thing, the games, were really the thing we all paid the most attention (really :) )! I saw some trends. The free2play games are getting worse. Just a few showed different. Even big names like "Lord of the Rings online" were so horrible, they must be very early beta. At Gamigo I saw "Angels of War". Well to put it this way... Your char runs so slow even the shortest ways takes forever, and the graphic is only basic, steering is gruesome. It doesn't look like a game ready for release. And I hope it gets improved. So most the F2P games are really not worth it (huh?) unlike last year.
The good: New paid MMORPGS are on their way that are promising, like "Rift". In RT-Strategy there is "End of Nations" which rocked the party! They are on my list. Trion really made a good presentation and had the good games. My personal NUMBER 1 this year!
And not to forget "Star Wars - The Old Republic" which promises to be epic. Well indeed the time to wait to get in the booth were epic...2 hours.

So all in all it was a lot of fun. I can't wait for 2011. I saw enough games for the next Expo to play.

Link to a bunch of photos: Gamescom 2010 in photos