2012-03-28

Google's Redirection of Blogger-Domains Is Problematic

Česky: Toto je ikona pro sociální síť. Je souč...
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Google, Google... what are you doing with the .blogspot-domains? I think it's not thought-out well. There is a problem for users in specific countries. But lets start at the beginning.

Google are redirecting blogspot-domains now in over 15 countries. That means if you are accessing an blog like <your blog>.blogspot.com from Russia, it gets automatically redirected to <your blog>.blogspot.ru. Google is doing this for law in different countries. If a jurisdiction wants to block out your site, they can do this by ordering Google to stop access to the site. Other countries could still access the site. While this is a double edged sword, it's understandable. But for the blog author, there is some questions now open. I'm not talking about statistics, which is also questionable, but legal stuff.

If you are blogging with a com domain, in english and not intended to target a special local audience outside, US law will apply. But if there is another domain-ending involved, you need to apply to the countries laws. That means in this example, you need to apply to Russian law. But you also need to apply to ALL other jurisdictions where from your blog is visited. There are even countries that require to ridiculously have an imprint with your personal address and telephone number even for non-commercial blogs. Insane.
Most used web browser in country or dependency...
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Now how are you supposed to blog without getting in touch with legal problems? Don't think it's enough not to live in this country.

It's a bad move from Google. It leaves many legal questions unanswered. To prevent redirecting you can add a piece of javascript to the header of your blog.
Put this right under the <head> tag:
<script type="text/javascript">
var blog = document.location.hostname;
var slug = document.location.pathname;
var ctld = blog.substr(blog.lastIndexOf(&quot;.&quot;));
if (ctld != &quot;.com&quot;) {
var ncr = &quot;http://&quot; + blog.substr(0, blog.indexOf(&quot;.&quot;));
ncr += &quot;.blogspot.com/ncr&quot; + slug;
window.location.replace(ncr);
}
</script>
But that requires the user to have javascript enabled. Very bad.
You can visit a blogspot-domain by adding /ncr after the domain like <your blog>.blogspot.com/ncr . Then it wont get redirected. That doesn't help if someone just visit your blog normally and thinks you need to get a letter for abusing local laws somewhere.

Solution anyone?

2012-03-21

Lying As A Blogger Is Still Lying

If someone wants to convince you, lying is okay because you're a blogger, that definitely makes him no blogger, but a liar.

LIES
LIES (Photo credit: Leo Reynolds)
Every Blogger has responsibility. If you lie, there is nothing what can make this less bad, even if Mike Daisey may think so. Jeff Jarvis reported about the Incident at This American Life. The staged visit to a factory that produces for Apple in China, is firing backwards.

This American Life now retracted from the story. And asking, what is really known about the situation. Almost anything we know, comes from Apple. But it's a player in this game. So there are only a few really trustworthy sources. But this should not lead bloggers to report all kind of crap about it.

if you don't have enough information for a story, don't break one. Too  bad for your clicks, but just writing something up, might help you with the Apple-church, but someday, it will leak, and then your reputation is gone.
Bloggers are not allowed to lie, because they are bloggers and no old media journalists. Hey wait a minute. Journalists don't lie? Geez, you really believe that? But still, that doesn't mean, bloggers may lie.
The opposite is right. Because you're a blogger, you have to, and you can, tell the truth. The public is skeptical with bloggers content. One bad article, and it harms the blogosphere once more. You have to watch out even more carefully, not to bend the truth, because people will prove your article more than they will do with a regular press article. Because they almost want you to lie. You're a blogger.

So let us get our crap together and stop breaking constructed stories, only to get clicks. If you don't have a story, shut up and get another one. But please, don't hurt the blogger scene with more untrue crap.

2012-03-15

Google+ Photos With New Album Organization

The long rumored end of Picasa seems to be fulfilled in the near future. With the integration of new organization features, Google+ Photos, or simply Google Photos, it makes sense now.


For some month, the link in the black Google bar on every Google page, leads you to the new photo service in Google+. That was frustrating, because not nearly the function were available there. No competition to Picasa. Now you can also organize your albums with Google+ photos. That's a major leap. You can move, delete and sort photos in bulk. The interface lets you do this even more quickly than Picasa. Many effects of Picnik has been integrated. Picnik shuts down in April and hopefully more features will be coming to G+ photos.

The way is set to end Picasa. But there is still some work. Removing photos from the map (aka gps coordinates) and set albums not to show the location but preserving that gps location for you, is an essential feature for privacy and comfort.

Update: Of course, I almost forgot. The restriction of 2048px must fall, too. That means, everything you upload from Google+ photos is scaled down to 2048px on the largest side. The resolution is too low for serious photo archiving. Until then, Picasa is still the place to upload.

[via Google+]

2012-03-14

New Zynga.com Portal Boosts Your City

Photo by Zynga. All rights reserved.
If you play e.g. CityVille on Zynga.com instead at G+ or Facebook, you can benefit a lot.

The tip came from Sam Chi, and totally surprised me. Instead of only getting material and help from yoe Facebook-Fans, you can participate with anyone playing the same game. No registration needed. It uses your City from Facebook, if you already play.

This is good news for gamers. Since Facebook changed the view of the stream to a very complicated piece of crap, almost no one sees your game notifications anymore, even the persons that really want to help you, and need help on their own. With using the games directly from Zynga, it's much easier to get materials and help instantly if you set it that anyone can see your requests.

In addition, it's slightly faster than the Facebook-version. Nice move. Thanks Zynga. 

2012-03-12

Google+ Makes A Big Misktake With The API

What is wrong with Google lately? I know some people don't like automatic posting, I learned from that Google+ article, but the consequences are bad.


io2008_vic
io2008_vic (Photo credit: Fotinakis)
This is really a downturn for Google+.
+Vic Gundotra tells us at SXSW, the Google+ API will not have write access anytime soon. And it's not even planned for this year. Kiss your idea bye bye for having apps posting your check-in or likes.


Well, I tell you what is not going to happen: Massive amount of people, businesses and news sites are giving up their own blog or site and come to Google+ to post their stuff trapped inside another social network. Not even if Google+ would be the leading network.It's not going to happen.
News agencies dual posting manually to G+ and their own site. Most professional bloggers won't either. There is no value that outweighs the afford.It's not going to happen.
Mobile bloggers and quick mobile news postings, wont be made, because you would need to manually post it twice to "the rest of the Internet" and G+. Guess who will win? It's not going to happen.


I can't see me doing this. My blog is my home. Not yet another social network. My blogs have survived many shifts and services over the last decade. I tried to be "exclusive" on an social network before. It was a disaster.
I can't see businesses are doing it. The companies homepage is important. Having the newest articles on G+ is fine, and users will appreciate it. But there needs to be a way to do that automatically.
I'm wondering about some people, not all, supporting this absurd read-only API with the fear of "spam" or "bot-posts". I can't understand that fear. Here's why:


You have to circle someone to see their post. If you do so, and seeing that someone pulls in some crap feeds, or never engages in conversation, it's just a click and they are uncircled. You can even block/report someone if it's plain spam. So where the heck is the problem? I don't get it.
On the other site, without the ability to autopost stuff on Google+, the users there will lose a lot of, possible very important and interesting stuff, because of the above mentioned sites and users that will never manually post their stuff.


Without the write-access for the API, users on G+ are the losers. With the quick mobile world, nobody will post to every network separately. It looks like Google trying to force people to be on G+ exclusively. But I don't see how they will force the important people to go completely to that service.
I can't give someone a link to my Google+ profile, because not all of my activities on the net are aggregated there. So I still have to give my Twitter-feed. Because anything related to me is there.
The questions remains what Google wants to go with G+. A small private network, or a big source of information for everyone?

2012-03-07

Facebook Not Reachable For Me And WhoIs Hilarious Entries

As I wanted to play CityVille this morning, I found Facebook is not reachable for me. Chrome comes up with a message saying:

This webpage is not available

That is strange. Ping does work, but slowly with ~160ms. So I checked WhoIs and found some hilarious entries. I don't know, maybe they are there forever. I never checked that domain before, but it's quite funny what's showing up...


Really?
Hum... But anyways, I can't reach Facebook. I don't have a clue why this is. I found no messages up until now, saying that it's offline or something. So I assume the problem is only for a number of people, or just me :)